Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Ensure the Safe Shipment of Hazardous Materials - Railroad
Bookmark and Share this page

 Ensure the Safe Shipment of Hazardous Materials - Railroad

Safe Shipment of HazMat header graphic

What is the problem?

Transporting hazardous materials (HAZMAT) on our rails comes with the risk of a train derailment in which tank cars can become punctured, releasing cargo and, in some cases, resulting in a fireball. When such a derailment involves a crude oil or ethanol unit train, multiple tank cars might spill their contents, fueling large pool fires.

We have investigated many accidents and derailments since 2010 involving DOT-111 tank cars that have been breached and leak HAZMAT. In two such noteworthy accidents—the April 2014 petroleum crude oil train derailment in Lynchburg, Virginia, and the February 2015 crude oil train derailment in Mount Carbon, West Virginia— we identified a number of crashworthiness issues in the common DOT-111 tank car design related to tank heads, shells, and fittings, which made the tank cars vulnerable to punctures, leaks, and spills.

Congress has mandated that the industry transition to a new DOT-117 tank car standard to transport flammable liquids by rail. Although different phase-out deadlines apply to the various DOT-111 designs and types of cargo, no intermediate milestones have been established to ensure compliance with these deadlines. Consequently, tank car fleet owners may choose when to retrofit or replace their flammable liquids tank cars based on several factors, such as market conditions, cost–benefit considerations, available capital, and the feasibility of assigning less-robust tank cars to other nonflammable liquids service.

U.S. crude-oil-by-rail volumes have fluctuated sharply over the past decade. According to the Association of American Railroads (AAR), in 2008, U.S. Class 1 railroads originated 9,500 carloads of crude oil. That grew to nearly 500,000 carloads in 2014, but then fell to just under 130,000 carloads by 2017.

Today, railroads account for 60 to 70 percent of ethanol movement. Each of the seven U.S. Class 1 railroads transport ethanol, with some serving several dozen plants. An estimated 15 to 20 percent of ethanol rail movements originate on short line and regional railroads.

We have seen some progress by the railroad industries to convert their tank cars from the outdated DOT-111/CPC 1232 to the new DOT-117/120 tank cars, but more work needs to be done. According to the AAR, the number of DOT-111 tank cars shipping ethanol has dropped since 2015, from 30,688 to about 18,704 so far in 2018.

What can be done?

The rail industry must replace DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars with the DOT-117 design as soon as possible—well in advance of the deadline established by Congress. Using the same tank cars that carry food products to carry flammable liquids endangers the public and the environment. The faster industry upgrades the fleet to the DOT-117 tank car, the safer flammable liquids rail transportation will be.

To address the risks posed by the transportation of HAZMAT on our rails, the following actions should be taken:

Tank Car Fleet Owners

  • Replace the old DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars as quickly as possible with the new DOT-117 design. The deadline for replacing less-robust tank cars extends more than 13 years, from 2018 to 2025 for crude and ethanol, and to 2029 for all other Class 3 flammable materials. The current pace of retrofits and replacement must follow a schedule—such as 146 tank cars/month crude oil, 351 tank cars/ month ethanol, 195 tank cars/month PG I other flammable liquids, and 305 tank cars/month PG II and III other flammable liquids—to achieve the FAST Act deadlines.

Regulators

  • Require an aggressive, intermediate progress milestone schedule for replacing or retrofitting legacy DOT-111 and CPC-1232 tank cars to appropriate performance standards. This schedule should include equipping tank cars with jackets, thermal protection, and appropriately sized pressure-relief devices.
  • Evaluate the risks posed to train crews by transporting HAZMAT by rail; after that, withdraw regulatory interpretation 06-0278 which pertains to Title 49 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) 174.85 for positioning placarded rail cars in a train and require that all trains have a minimum of five nonplacarded cars between any locomotive or occupied equipment and the nearest placarded car transporting HAZMAT, regardless of train length and consist.
  • Develop specific guidance for railroads using the list of items found in appendix D of 49 CFR Part 172 and apply the information gathered in railroads’ risk assessments when analyzing proposed routes for high-hazard flammable trains or high-hazard flammable unit trains.

Industry (Associations), Communities, and Emergency Responders

  • Work together to improve education regarding HAZMAT transportation safety and emergency response in the event of a release.

< back to issue area | < back to Most Wanted List