Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Driver Errors, Advanced Driver Assistance System Design, Led to Highway Crash
Bookmark and Share this page

 Driver Errors, Advanced Driver Assistance System Design, Led to Highway Crash

WASHINGTON (Sept. 4, 2019) — A driver’s inattention, overreliance on his car’s advanced driver assistance system, and use of the system inconsistent with manufacturer guidance, coupled with the system permitting driver disengagement from the driving task, led to the Jan. 22, 2018, crash in Culver City, California, according to a National Transportation Safety Board brief issued Wednesday.

Highway Accident Brief 19/07 details the results of the NTSB’s investigation of the crash involving a Tesla Model S P85 and a Culver City Fire Department 2006 Seagrave Fire Truck in the high-occupancy vehicle lane of southbound Interstate 405. No one was injured as a result of the crash.

The response to a collision in the northbound freeway lanes 25 minutes earlier left a California Highway Patrol vehicle parked on the left shoulder of southbound I-405 and the Culver City Fire Department truck parked diagonally across the southbound HOV lane. Emergency lights were active on both vehicles. The Tesla, which had its “Autopilot” system engaged, was traveling in the HOV lane, behind another vehicle.  After the lead vehicle changed lanes to the right, the Tesla remained in the HOV lane, accelerated and struck the rear of the fire truck at a recorded speed of about 31 mph. A forward collision warning alert occurred 0.49 seconds prior to impact but the automatic emergency braking system did not engage. The driver’s hands were not detected on the steering wheel during this sequence nor did the driver apply steering or braking prior to impact. 

Tesla’s “Autopilot” system includes Autosteer and Traffic-Aware Cruise Control. Autosteer is a lane-keeping assist system that can only be engaged after Traffic-Aware Cruise Control is activated. The Traffic-Aware Cruise Control is an adaptive cruise control system that modifies speed based on information from the camera and radar sensors. The Tesla Model S owner’s manual contains numerous warnings about the limitations of Traffic-Aware Cruise Control and warnings about Autosteer and the need for drivers to keep their hands on the wheel.

The NTSB determined the probable cause for the crash was the Tesla driver’s lack of response to the fire truck parked in his lane, due to his inattention and overreliance on the car’s advanced driver assistance system; the Tesla’s “Autopilot” design which permitted the driver to disengage from the driving task; and the driver’s use of the system in ways inconsistent with guidance and warnings from Tesla. 

whole_trip.jpg 
(This NTSB graphic depicts periods of manual and “Autopilot” control, with callouts showing the percentage and duration of time the driver of a Tesla had his hands off the steering wheel while “Autopilot” was engaged, for a Jan. 22, 2019, trip that ended with a highway crash. NTSB graphic)
 
The NTSB’s investigation revealed the crash trip lasted about 66 minutes, covering about 30 miles, with the “Autopilot” system engaged for a total of 29 minutes, 4 seconds. Hands were detected on the Tesla’s steering wheel for only 78 seconds of that 29-minute, 4-second period. For most of the time the system was engaged, it did not detect driver -applied steering wheel torque (hands on the steering wheel). The “Autopilot” system issued several hands-off alerts during the last 13 minutes, 48 seconds prior to the crash and was engaged continuously during those nearly 14 final minutes of the crash trip. In the last 3 minutes, 41 seconds before the crash the system did not detect driver-applied steering wheel torque. 

During most of the driver’s operation with the “Autopilot” engaged, the system detected and followed a lead vehicle, one that was ahead of the Tesla. In the 15 seconds prior to the crash the system detected and followed two different lead vehicles. Data show that 3 to 4 seconds before the crash, the lead vehicle changed lanes to the right, a movement commonly referred to as a “cut-out scenario” in testing and research. When the Traffic-Aware Cruise Control no longer detected a lead vehicle, the system accelerated the Tesla from about 21 mph toward the preset cruise speed of 80 mph, which had been set by the driver about 5 minutes before the crash. The “Autopilot” system detected a stationary object in the Tesla’s path about 0.49 seconds before the crash and the forward collision warning activated, displaying a visual warning and sounding an auditory warning. By the moment of impact, the Tesla had accelerated to 30.9 mph.
 
Highway Accident Brief 19/07 is available online at https://go.usa.gov/xV8xW and the public docket, which contains all the evidence considered in the determination of probable cause, is available online at https://go.usa.gov/xVkTk

Enter the YouTube ID of each video separated by a semi-colon (;). Example: "LV5_xj_yuhs; QgaTQ5-XfMM; VWW8DMpfI9U; BgAlQuqzl8o;"

 

Contact: NTSB Media Relations
490 L'Enfant Plaza, SW
Washington, DC 20594
 
 
 

###