Skip Ribbon Commands
Skip to main content
Aviation Accident

Quick Launch

NTSB Identification: DCA17IA148
Scheduled 14 CFR Part 129: Foreign operation of Air Canada
Incident occurred Friday, July 07, 2017 in San Francisco, CA
Probable Cause Approval Date: 10/26/2018
Aircraft: Airbus A320-211, registration: C-FKCK
Injuries: Unavailable

NTSB investigators used data provided by various sources and may have traveled in support of this investigation to prepare this aircraft incident report.

NTSB investigators traveled in support of this investigation and used data obtained from various sources to prepare this aircraft incident report.

The NTSB's full report is available at The Aircraft Incident Report number is NTSB/AIR-18/01.

On July 7, 2017, about 2356 Pacific daylight time, Air Canada flight 759, an Airbus A320-211, Canadian registration C-FKCK, was cleared to land on runway 28R at San Francisco International Airport, San Francisco, California, but instead lined up with parallel taxiway C. Four air carrier airplanes (a Boeing 787, an Airbus A340, another Boeing 787, and a Boeing 737) were on taxiway C awaiting clearance to take off from runway 28R. The incident airplane descended to an altitude of 100 ft above ground level and overflew the first airplane on the taxiway. The incident flight crew initiated a go-around, and the airplane reached a minimum altitude of about 60 ft and overflew the second airplane on the taxiway before starting to climb. None of the 5 flight crewmembers and 135 passengers aboard the incident airplane were injured, and the incident airplane was not damaged. The incident flight was operated by Air Canada under Title 14 Code of Federal Regulations Part 129 as an international scheduled passenger flight from Toronto/Lester B. Pearson International Airport, Toronto, Canada. An instrument flight rules flight plan had been filed. Night visual meteorological conditions prevailed at the time of the incident.

The National Transportation Safety Board determines the probable cause(s) of this incident as follows:
  • The flight crew's misidentification of taxiway C as the intended landing runway, which resulted from the crewmembers' lack of awareness of the parallel runway closure due to their ineffective review of notice to airmen (NOTAM) information before the flight and during the approach briefing. Contributing to the incident were (1) the flight crew's failure to tune the instrument landing system frequency for backup lateral guidance, expectation bias, fatigue due to circadian disruption and length of continued wakefulness, and breakdowns in crew resource management and (2) Air Canada's ineffective presentation of approach procedure and NOTAM information.