WPR09IA140
WPR09IA140

HISTORY OF FLIGHT

On March 3, 2009, at 1045 mountain standard time, a Eurocopter AS 350 B2 helicopter, N197AE, sustained minor damage following a loss of engine power and subsequent forced landing near the Canyon West Airport, Peach Springs, Arizona. The helicopter was registered to XEBEC, LLC, and operated by Papillon Airways, Inc., under the provisions of 14 Code of Federal Regulations (CFR) Part 135. The commercial pilot and six passengers were not injured. Visual meteorological conditions prevailed and a company visual flight rules flight plan was filed for the air tour flight. The flight originated from the Boulder City Airport, Boulder City, Nevada, at 1015.

In a written report submitted to the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) on March 3, a representative employed by the operator reported the purpose of the flight was to transport passengers from the departure airport to a remote sightseeing area in the Grand Canyon. Approximately 30 minutes after departure, during the descent to the landing area, the pilot heard a "loud pop" followed by a loss of main rotor RPM. The pilot transmitted a mayday call and performed an autorotation.

The pilot reported that while descending into a canyon, he heard a loud pop followed by a loss of rotor rpm and subsequent low rotor rpm warning horn. The pilot lowered the collective and regained rotor rpm when he observed multiple warning lights illuminated on the instrument panel. The pilot stated that he raised the collective to "check if I had any power available" and heard the low rotor rpm warning horn a second time. The pilot initiated an autorotation to a clear area adjacent to his position and landed without further incident. The pilot added that after landing, the engine was not running, however, the rotor blades were still turning.

PERSONNEL INFORMATION

The pilot, age 27, held a commercial helicopter pilot certificate, and a helicopter instrument rating. In addition, he held a flight instructor certificate, with a rotorcraft helicopter and instrument rating. His most recent second-class medical certificate was issued March 3, 2009, with no limitations.

According to operator, the pilot had accumulated approximately 1,968 total flight hours, with 503 hours in AS350 series helicopters.

HELICOPTER INFORMATION

The single-engine, seven-place helicopter was a Eurocopter AS350 B2 that had been converted to an AS350 “SD2” under Supplemental Type Certificate SR01647SE. This STC conversion included the installation of the Honeywell LTS101-700D-2 engine in the AS350B2 in place of the original Turbomeca Arriel 1D1 engine.

The most recent maintenance performed on the engine was a 150-hour inspection on January 28, 2009. At the time of inspection, the engine time since new (TSN) was 8319.9 hours, time since overhaul (TSO) 2095.9 hours, Ng cycles of 13192.05, and Np cycles of 9279.25.

TESTS AND RESEARCH

The Honeywell LTS101-700D-2 turboshaft engine was removed from the helicopter and shipped to Honeywell Aerospace, Phoenix, Arizona, for examination and disassembly. The examination commenced on May 5, 2009 under the supervision of NTSB investigators.

The engine was intact with nominal impact damage noted. Various airframe components including the aircraft starter/generator, power shaft and adapters, aircraft fire detection system, torque measurement transducer and associated hardware, engine exhaust tailpipe, inlet adapter, and various airframe clamps and bracket hardware remained installed on the engine.

The power turbine rotated about 5 degrees by hand before binding. The gas producer shaft rotated freely via the axial compressor rotor. Rotational continuity was established throughout the power turbine accessories, accessory gearbox, and output shaft.

The gas generator module was intact. The compressor bearing retainer assembly was intact and undamaged. The number one bearing liner and seal rotor were intact and undamaged. The compressor vane assembly and axial compressor rotor were intact and undamaged. A black residue was observed on all axial compressor rotor blades. The compressor impeller was intact and undamaged. Evidence of oil was observed near the hub of the inducer of the compressor impeller. Rub marks were observed on the compressor impeller blades near the inducer.

The compressor assembly shaft was intact and undamaged. The impeller shroud was intact and appeared undamaged. Evidence of oil was observed along the flowpath of the impeller shroud. Rotational score marks were observed at the inducer of the impeller shroud at the 11 o'clock position. The compressor diffuser assembly, diffuser housing assembly, and Gas Producer (GP) turbine nozzle were intact and undamaged.

The GP turbine nozzle ring seals were intact and undamaged. The compressor shaft spur gear and low fence link assembly actuator were intact and undamaged. The number two roller bearing was intact and black in color. When the number two roller bearing was rotated, some resistance was noted.

The number one ball bearing was intact, undamaged and rotated freely. The number one ball bearing was not removed from the compressor housing. Evidence of seal leakage was noted.

Examination of the power turbine module revealed that the rear bearing support housing was intact and undamaged. Debris was observed within the oil scavenge passage of the rear bearing support housing near the oil feed ring assembly. The oil sump area of the rear bearing support housing was black in color. The rear bearing support was removed and installed on a flow test bench. The flow test revealed that the assembly flowed approximately one-half of the normal oil flow. Irregular flow patterns were observed from the oil feed ring during the flow test.

The combustor liner assembly was intact and undamaged. The power turbine nozzle assembly was intact. Rotational scoring was observed around a 360-degree circumference of the power turbine nozzle assembly which corresponded to the power turbine blades.

The number three bearing spacer was undamaged. The oil feed ring assembly was intact and black in color. Debris was observed adhering to the oil feed ring assembly.

The number two bearing outer race was intact and black in color. The number two bearing seal assembly was intact.

Scoring was observed on the power turbine shaft, which corresponded to the number three bearing inner race. The shaft of the power turbine rotor assembly was intact and discolored near the number three bearing.

Further examination of the number two bearing, number three bearing, oil feed ring and rear bearing support housing revealed the following:

Number Two Roller Bearing

Examination of the number two roller bearing revealed nominal mechanical damage. The outer liner, inner race, cage, and rolling elements of the bearing exhibited heat discoloration. The inner race rotated freely with respect to the cage and rolling elements. The rolling elements rotated freely within the pockets. Light and uniform wear was observed on the bearing components. Oil residue was observed on the bearing components.

Rear Bearing Support Housing

Examination of the rear bearing support housing revealed no significant damage. The accessible oil passages that feed the oil supply ring and number three ball bearing were examined internally using a borescope. The borescope examination revealed evidence of deposits consistent with coked oil on the walls of each passage.

Oil Feed Ring

X-ray examination of the oil feed ring revealed a blockage in the main oil passage. A cross section through the oil passages revealed long, smooth flakes/chips of black colored material in the main passage, near the aft end. The flakes/chips blocked the inlets of the two aft oil jets, which feed the number three ball bearing. An Energy Dispersive x-ray (EDX) and infrared analysis revealed that the flakes/chips were "most likely composed of coked synthetic oil."

Number Three Bearing

Examination of the number three bearing revealed that the inner race sections and balls exhibited rub type damage, deformation and heat like discoloration. The outer race exhibited a zone of "highly heat affected microstructure emanating from the rubbed ball contact surface." Heat affected material from the balls and/or the forward race was deposited on the outer race, aft inner race, and cage. The cage was intact and exhibited a moderate amount of pocket wear. No distinct evidence of oil residue was observed on the bearing components.

Additional details pertaining to the teardown, exam and maintenance records are contained within the public docket for this accident.

ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

On January 30, 2009, Honeywell International Inc, issued an Operating Information Letter (OIL) to all owners, operators, airframe manufacturers, distributors, sales and service organizations, and field service representatives utilizing the LT101 series engine. The purpose of the letter was "to provide information which specifies the intent of the non-emergency engine shutdown procedure and maintenance actions to be taken if these shutdown procedures cannot be followed."

The letter stated, in part "...The shutdown procedure consists of the following steps. The first step requires the power lever to be set to idle for a minimum of 2 minutes prior to shutdown. This second step after shutdown is that the engine is to be motored using the starter motor for 10 seconds. These steps provide a means to stabilize the engine component temperatures to idle conditions prior to shutdown and ensure temperature stabilization to the engine. If the procedure is not followed based on experience seen in development and fielded engines, coke built up in the No 2 and No 3 bearing oil jets and sump area will occur. Coke build up in these locations may result in a loss of oil flow to the bearings which will lead to a bearing failure."

During the course of the examination, a representative from the operator reported that company pilots were instructed to comply with the recommended engine idle cool down procedure; however, company policy did not direct pilots to comply with the recommended post shutdown cranking/motoring after engine shutdown procedure due, in part, to operational concerns regarding the depletion of oil in the engine oil reservoir.

Use your browsers 'back' function to return to synopsis
Return to Query Page