On July 5, 2008, at 8:36 p.m. eastern daylight time, controllers at the John F. Kennedy International Airport tower (JFK ATCT) reported a near midair collision (NMAC) involving Cayman Airways flight 792 (CAY792) and Linea Aerea Nacional de Chile flight 533 (LAN533) near the departure ends of runways 13R and 22L. CAY792 was a Boeing 737-300 that had been cleared to land on runway 22L by the Local 1 controller (LC1) following a flight from Grand Cayman Island to JFK. LAN533 was a Boeing 767-300 that had been cleared for takeoff on runway 13R by the Local 2 controller (LC2) for a flight to Santiago, Chile. Both aircraft were operating under the provisions fo Code of Federal Regulations Title 14 part 129 foreign-carrier passenger flights in visual conditions under instrument flight rules (IFR). There was no damage to either aircraft and no injuries were reported. Following the reported NMAC, CAY792 was vectored for another approach and landed successfully. LAN533 continued its departure and the remainder of its flight. Use your browsers 'back' function to return to synopsisReturn to Query Page
DETAILS OF THE INVESTIGATION
The Safety Board became aware of the possible NMAC following a press inquiry on July 7, two days after the incident. Preliminary investigation raised concerns about the air traffic procedures being used for converging runway operations at JFK. The ATC group met at JFK Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) on July 11, 2008, to discuss the incident with the Air Traffic Manager (ATM), review collected radio and radar data, observe the operational positions occupied by the controllers who handled CAY792 and LAN533, interview the controller-in-charge and the controller in contact with LAN533, and review other background data related to the incident. On July 12, we returned to interview the local controller handling CAY792. We then completed our work at JFK and left the facility.
During our inbrief, we asked the ATM to explain what runway separation requirements existed between runways 13R and 22L. He responded that the runways were operated independently when visual separation could be applied, but that there were local provisions for ensuring that radar separation was maintained between traffic using those two runways when weather conditions precluded application of visual separation.
History of Flight
At the time of the reported NMAC, JFK ATCT was using runways 13L and 22R for arrivals, and runway 13R for departures. This is a normal configuration that is addressed in the JFK ATCT Standard Operating Procedures (SOP).
LAN533 had been taxied to runway 13R for takeoff, and was cleared into position and hold by the LC2 controller at 2034:15. LAN533 was cleared for takeoff at 2034:54. The flight's initial IFR clearance was to follow the Kennedy 1 departure, which is a vector procedure that directs pilots to "climb via assigned heading, maintain 5,000." According to JFK management, LAN533 had been issued departure heading 170 as part of the pre-departure clearance delivery process.
At 8:34:50, CAY792 contacted the LC1 controller, reporting that they were on the VOR 22 approach passing RUSHY, which is 5 miles from the airport. The LC1 controller provided a wind check and cleared CAY792 to land on runway 22L.
At 8:35:47 and 8:35:52, the flight crew transmitted their callsign, with no further information. At 8:36:00, the LC1 controller transmitted, "Cayman 792 know what I want you to make a right turn, make a right turn heading one one, uh, all right Cayman 792 just maintain 1,000 please." At 8:36:12 the controller said, "I need a left turn, a quick left turn, a left turn heading 090 now, traffic on departure roll." The flight crew responded, "Left 090, roger." At 8:36:25, the crew asked the LC1 controller to verify the heading. The controller cleared CAY792 to climb to 2,000 feet, and reissued heading 090.
At 8:36:55, the controller changed the altitude clearance, instructing CAY792 to maintain 1,000 feet. The flight crew acknowledged. At 8:37:35, the LC1 controller recleared CAY792 to maintain 2,000 feet, and the crew acknowledged. At 8:37:48, CAY792 was instructed to change frequency to 125.7 (New York Terminal Radar Approach Control [TRACON]). At 8:38, the TRACON radar controller asked CAY792 for the reason for the go-around, and the crew responded that they were "a bit high." The controller vectored CAY792 for another approach, and the aircraft successfully landed on the second attempt.
2. Radar Data
Radar data for this incident was obtained from the ASR-9 radar system located on JFK airport. According to the recorded radar targets, the minimum observed lateral and vertical distance between the two aircraft was 0.57 nautical mile (nm) and 200 feet as they turned to their assigned headings. The aircraft then diverged. CAY792 continued eastbound at 1,000 feet until approximately 3 miles from the airport, when the controller cleared the aircraft to 2,000 feet.
During the period that CAY792 was instructed to maintain 1,000 feet, the aircraft entered an area where the minimum vectoring altitude is 1,400 feet. This resulted in less-than-standard terrain and obstacle separation, and JFK reported the event as an operational error on July 9, 2008. Because the 1,000 foot altitude was contained in the facility SOP for go-arounds, the error was attributed to facility procedures rather than controller performance.
3. Additional Event
On July 11, 2008 at 1:21 pm, while the Safety Board investigation of the July 5 incident was in progress, a similar event occurred involving Delta Airlines flight 123 (DAL123) and Comair flight 1520 (COM1520). DAL123 was on approach to runway 22L, and COM1250 was departing from runway 13R. DAL123 was instructed to contact JFK tower by the N90 arrival radar controller, but the crew misunderstood the frequency. As a result, the pilot first contacted the tower when the aircraft was about three miles from the runway. The LC1 controller cleared DAL123 to land. When the flight was about 1.5 miles from the runway, the pilot reported that he was going around. The LC1 controller directed a left turn and climb similar to the maneuver executed by CAY792, and the LC2 controller instructed COM1250 to turn to the south. The closest point of approach occurred at 1:21:28 UTC, when the aircraft were separated by 0.44 nm laterally and 800 feet vertically.
Following the second incident, the Director of the Eastern Terminal Service Area directed that the use of converging operations at JFK be terminated pending a procedural review and submission of a plan to conduct such operations in compliance with existing ATC directives, in particular paragraph 3-10-4 of FAA Order 7110.65, which states:
3-10-4. INTERSECTING RUNWAY SEPARATION Issue traffic information to each aircraft operating on intersecting runways.
a. Separate an arriving aircraft using one runway from another aircraft using an intersecting runway or a nonintersecting runway when the flight paths intersect by ensuring that the arriving aircraft does not cross the landing threshold or flight path of the other aircraft until one of the following conditions exists:
1. The preceding aircraft has departed and passed the intersection/flight path or is airborne and turning to avert any conflict.
2. A preceding arriving aircraft is clear of the landing runway, completed landing roll and will hold short of the intersection/flight path, or has passed the intersection/flight path.
When visual separation is being applied by the tower, appropriate control instructions and traffic advisories must be issued to ensure go around or missed approaches avert any conflict with the flight path of traffic on the other runway.
According to the FAA, a near midair collision is defined as an incident associated with the operation of an aircraft in which a possibility of collision occurs as a result of proximity of less than 500 feet to another aircraft [that is, 500 feet absolute distance], or a report is received from a pilot or a flight crew member stating that a collision hazard existed between two or more aircraft. Neither of the two incidents described in this report met the proximity criteria, and the flight crews did not submit NMAC reports.